During a June 3 campaign stop in San Bernardino, Hillary Clinton referred to the December 2 terror attack as “gun violence,” and pledged anew to “take on the gun lobby.”On December 2 two Muslim attackers–Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik–shot and killed 14 co-workers during a company Christmas party. They carried long guns and handguns, as well as one bomb. Following the incident, police discovered more bombs and bomb making parts in the couple’s residence. The terrorist ties and motivations in the case were so evident that two days after the attack — on December 4 — the New York Times reported that the FBI was treating the act as terrorism. FBI director James Comey said, “The investigation has so far developed indications of radicalization by the killers, and of potential inspiration by foreign terrorist organizations.” But gun control is a central tenet of the Clinton campaign, and more “gun violence” helps make a stronger case for more gun control. Denying that the San Bernardino attack was terrorism also enables Clinton to continue to ignore radical Islam — a term she refuses even to utter. According to the Los Angeles Times, Clinton looked at attendees of the San Bernardino rally and said, “You here in this beautiful city know the horrors, the losses associated with gun violence are just unimaginable.” She then segued into promises of fighting “the gun lobby.” You see America career politicians love using terror attacks, to push their political agendas that will disband us from our rights. After this I really can't believe some Americans still support Hillary, by calling the San Bernardino terrorist attack gun violence instead of terrorism. Equating a radical Islamic terror attack to gun violence, is you using a tragic event to push the gun control agenda.
Anti msm news, Created by a US NAVY vet. "Seek the truth" Check me out on Facebook and Twitter at top of page, also check me out on gab.ai @PuppetStringNews