The CIA intelligence on Russian involvement in the U.S. presidential election is so sketchy that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in response to questions from members of Congress who were briefed on the CIA report, testified before the House Intelligence Committee that the CIA’s contentions about Russia were «fuzzy and ambiguous». The FBI did not support the CIA’s findings, claiming that the CIA’s conclusions lacked «facts and tangible evidence». Even the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Devin Nunes of California, told The Washington Post that, as far as he was concerned, the CIA conclusions about Russia lacked «clear evidence», adding, «There’s a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, that’s it. America let's give the Obama administration some of it's own medicine, by labeling the Obama CIA who is pushing this false narrative of Russia winning the election of Donald Trump as "fake intelligence". The Obama CIA is basically hell bent on a fake news article published by the Washington Post this Friday, and on a November 17th intelligence committee hearing...All seventeen intelligence agencies stated they had no proof of Russian involvement in the 2016 election. By the CIA through the Washington Post pushing this false narrative of Russia taking part in electing Donald Trump, after they released it after the fact they had an intelligence testimony that determined they found no such evidence...This Obama CIA claim should only be labeled as "fake intelligence" pushed by the "fake intelligence" source known as the CIA...And remember America CIA operatives are trained on the job to lie in the first place.