Rulings against the ban this week in Hawaii and Maryland concluded that it violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits government bias for or against or any religion. The DOJ's appeal of the Maryland federal court's ruling moves the case to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. An appeal of the Hawaii ruling would have sent the issue to the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit, which previously ruled against the first travel ban. When it comes to President Trump's Travel ban and these judges ruling against it as a Muslim ban, they really need to explain how this is a Muslim ban...When Muslim nations like Iraq, Afghanistan, Oman, Kuwait, Jordan and others are not involved in it. These Federal judges claiming that Trump's travel ban is a Muslim ban, it's simply not that because it involves a small percentage of all Muslim nations on Earth. If these six nations were peaceful and didn't become failed states under the rule of radical Islam, then this ban wouldn't even need to happen in the first place. The main reason for President Trump's ban is the National Security of the United States, and Trump's travel ban is simply protecting Americana citizens...Even those who are Muslim from nations that are infested with tragic radical Islamic problems like the six nations involved in Trump's second lawful immigration ban that is only temporary by the way. With this appeal going to the 4th Circuit instead of the 9th Circuit...President Trump has some positive hope that this ban will be reinstated, but there's nothing saying the judge panel will be full of Obama appointed judges like in the case of the two judges blocking Trump's ban in Maryland and Hawaii...Who are both Obama appointed.